Victorias Milling Co., Inc. vs. Municipality of Victorias, L-21183, September 27, 1968
FACTS: This is a petition for review on
certiorari of the July 27, 1984 Decision of the Office of the Presidential
Assistant For Legal Affairs dismissing the appeal from the adverse ruling of
the Philippine Ports Authority on the sole ground that the same was filed
beyond the reglementary period.
On April 28,
1981, the Iloilo Port Manager of respondent Philippine Ports Authority (PPA for
short) wrote petitioner Victorias Milling Co., requiring it to have its
tugboats and barges undergo harbor formalities and pay entrance/clearance fees
as well as berthing fees effective May 1, 1981. PPA, likewise, requiring
petitioner to secure a permit for cargo handling operations at its Da-an Banua
wharf and remit 10% of its gross income for said operations as the government's
share.
Victorias
Milling Co. maintained that it is except from paying PPA any fee or charge
because: 1. The wharf and its facilities are built and installed on it’s own
land; 2. Repairs and maintenance are solely paid by it; 3. Maintenance and
dredging of the channel are done by the Company personnel; 4. At not time has
the government paid any centavo for such activities.
ISSUE: WON the
Victorias Milling Co. claim of exception for PPA fees is meritorious.
HELD: No, the
petitioners claim that there is no basis for the PPA to assess and impose the
dues and charge is devoid of merit.
As correctly
stated by the Solicitor General, the fees and charges PPA collects are not for
the use of the wharf that petitioner owns but for the privilege of navigating
in public waters, of entering and leaving public harbours and berthing on
public streams or waters.
As to the
requirement to remit 10% of the handling charges, Section 6B-(ix) of the
Presidential Decree No. 857 authorized the PPA "To levy dues, rates, or
charges for the use of the premises, works, appliances, facilities, or for
services provided by or belonging to the Authority, or any organization
concerned with port operations." This 10% government share of earnings of
arrastre and stevedoring operators is in the nature of contractual compensation
to which a person desiring to operate arrastre service must agree as a
condition to the grant of the permit to operate.
No comments:
Post a Comment